Evaluation of BİLSEM teachers’ use of digital tools according to teachers’ opinions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2025.137Keywords:
Science and Art Center, eachers in Science and Art Center, Technology in EducationAbstract
This study aims to examine the role of digital tools in the educational process, teachers' perspectives on these tools, and the challenges they encounter. Additionally, it seeks to contribute to the identification of teaching strategies and the development of teacher training programs. The study adopts a phenomenological design and includes interviews with 20 teachers from various disciplines working at five different Science and Art Centers (Bilsem) in Gaziantep. Participants were selected using the criterion sampling method, and data were collected through a semi-structured interview form developed based on expert opinions. The collected data were analyzed using content analysis with the MaxQDA Analytics Pro software. The results indicate that in order for teachers working at Bilsem to use digital tools more effectively in their lessons and projects, it is essential to improve existing teaching methods and enhance training programs. These improvements should focus on integrating practical applications of digital tools into pedagogical practices, providing continuous professional development opportunities, and offering hands-on workshops tailored to teachers’ specific subject areas. Moreover, fostering a supportive institutional environment that encourages experimentation and collaboration among educators can significantly contribute to the effective integration of digital technologies in teaching and learning processes.
References
Akbulut, İ., Akyıldız, A., Yılmaz, S., Bayri, E., & Bayri, G. (2024). Eğitimde teknoloji kullanımının öğrenci başarısına etkisi [The effect of technology use in education on student achievement]. International QMX Journal, 3(2), 940-948.
Aktürk, A. O., & Delen, A. (2020). Öğretmenlerin teknoloji kabul düzeyleri ile öz-yeterlik inançları arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between teachers' technology acceptance levels and self-efficacy beliefs]. Bilim Eğitim Sanat ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 4(2), 67-80. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1152582
Al Rawashdeh, A. Z., Youssef, E., Alarab, A., & Alarab, M. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: Analyzing students’ perspectives. *The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19*(3), 107–117.
Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., & Yıldırım, E. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri [Research methods in the social sciences] (10. bs.). Sakarya Kitabevi. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339916586
Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, A. (2000). Taxonomy of teaching and learning: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Educational Psychology, 479-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Auttawutikul, S., Wiwitkunkasem, K., & Smith, D. R. (2014). Use of weblogs to enhance group learning and design creativity amongst students at a Thai university. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 378–388.
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2015). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Pearson.
Blanco-Herrera, J. A., Gentile, D. A., & Rokkum, J. N. (2019). Video games can increase creativity, but with caveats. Creativity Research Journal, 31(2), 119–131.
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Book I: Cognitive domain. David McKay.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853.html
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Colangelo, N. (2002). Handbook on gifted education (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.142040
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://repositorio.ciem.ucr.ac.cr/bitstream/123456789/501/1/Qualitative%20inquiry%20%26%20research%20design.%20design%20_%20Choosing%20among%20five%20approaches.%20%281%29.pdf
Çalışkan, E. (2017). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitiminde bilgi teknolojilerinden yararlanmaya ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi [An investigation of teachers’ views on the use of information technologies in the training of talented and gifted pupils]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 811–833. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.330149
Çubukçu, Z., & Tosuntaş, Ş. B. (2018). Üstün yetenekli/zekalı öğrencilerin eğitiminde teknolojinin yeri [The place of technology in the education of gifted/talented students]. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(13), 45-47. www.ejedus.org
Delibay, S. (2017, Kasım). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezi Sınavı, BİLSEM [Science and Art Center Exam, BİLSEM]. https://suleymandelibay.blogspot.com.tr/2017/11/bilim-sanat-merkezi-sinavibilsem.html
Demirel, Ö., & Ün, K. (1987). Eğitim terimleri [Educational terms]. Şafak Matbaacılık.
Deng, L., Wu, S., Chen, Y., & Peng, Z. (2020). Digital game‐based learning in a Shanghai primary‐school mathematics class: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 709–717.
Dickinson, K. J., & Bass, B. L. (2020). A systematic review of educational mobile applications (APPS) for surgery residents: Simulation and beyond. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(5), 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.022
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Fidan, T., & Öztürk, İ. (2015). Perspectives and expectations of union member and non-union member teachers on teacher unions. *Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi - Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5*(2), 191–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2015.52.10
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Gökdere, M., Küçük, M., & Çepni, S. (2004). Eğitim teknolojilerinin üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin fen eğitiminde kullanımı üzerine bir çalışma: Bilim sanat merkezleri örneklemi [A study on the use of educational technologies in science education of gifted students: Science and art centers sample]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 3(2), 149–157. https://www.tojet.net/
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
Günar, F., & Kaya, Z. (2023). Dijital teknolojiler ve eğitimde kullanımı [Digital technologies and their use in education]. Eğitim Teknolojileri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(2), 45-67.
Halcomb, E. J., & Davidson, P. M. (2006). Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Applied Nursing Research, 19(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.001
Hattie, J. A. C., & Yates, G. C. R. (2014). Using feedback to promote learning. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum (pp. 45–58). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.
Heick, T. (2020). The Role of Gamification in Modern Learning. Modern Teaching Quarterly, 8(4), 22-30.
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
Karsenti, T., & Bugmann, J. (2018). The ASPID model: A systemic approach to understand technology appropriation. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 1(1), 12-18. https://ijte.net/index.php/ijte/article/view/1330
Kaya, Z. (2022). Proje tabanlı öğretimin uzaktan eğitim sürecine etkisinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the effect of project-based teaching on distance education process] (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gaziantep Üniversitesi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Kaynar, T. (2019). Web 2.0 araçlarının yabancı dil öğretiminde kullanımı [The use of Web 2.0 tools in foreign language teaching] (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi.
Kazu, İ. Y., & Şenol, C. (2012). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programlarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (BİLSEM örneği) [Teachers' views on the education programs of the gifted (BİLSEM sample)]. *e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3*(2), 13–35. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/89749
Kırındı, T., & Durmuş, G. (2019). Examination of science teachers' knowledge of technological pedagogical fields. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(3), 1340-1375. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2019.20.03.010
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Kolburan Geçer, A., & Bakar-Çörez, A. (2020). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin BİT kaynaklarından yararlanma durumları ve yaşadıkları sorunlar: Kocaeli örneği [Secondary school teachers' use of ICT resources and the problems they experience: Kocaeli example]. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.544810
Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14.
Kurt, A. A., & İşman, A. (2022). Dijital pedagojik yeterlilikler ve öğretmen eğitimi [Digital pedagogical competencies and teacher education]. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 11(3), 87-102.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people, and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335
Manuel, D., & Freiman, V. (2017). Differentiating instruction using a virtual environment: A study of mathematical problem posing among gifted and talented learners. Global Education Review, 4(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316490872
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (1991). Üstün yetenekli çocukların eğitimi raporu [Report on the education of gifted children].
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley and Sons.
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Öngöz, S., & Aksoy, D. A. (2015). Üstün yetenekli öğrenciler bilişim teknolojileri dersinden ne bekliyorlar? [What do gifted students expect from information technologies course?]. Journal of Education & Special Education Technology, 1(1), 34-47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335757161
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3. baskı). SAGE Publications.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part 1. On The Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
Pyryt, M. C. (2009). Recent developments in technology: Implications for gifted education. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1163-1179). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_60
Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2014). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Pearson.
Sevencan, F., & Çilingiroğlu, N. (2007). Sağlık alanındaki araştırmalarda kullanılan niteliksel veri toplama yöntemleri [Qualitative data collection methods used in health research]. Toplum Hekimliği Bülteni, 26(1). http://www.thb.hacettepe.edu.tr/arsiv/2007/sayi_1/baslik1.pdf
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Sezginsoy, B. (2007). Bilim ve sanat merkezi uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of science and art center practices] (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Balıkesir Üniversitesi.
Shavinina, L. V. (2009). High intellectual and creative educational multimedia technologies for the gifted. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1181–1202). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_61
Siegle, D. (2005). Six uses of the Internet to develop students' gifts and talents. Gifted Child Today, 28(2), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2005-167
Siegle, D. (2019). Seeing is believing: Using virtual and augmented reality to enhance student learning. Gifted Child Today, 42(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518804854
Tantay. (2010). Özel veya üstün yetenekli çocuklara eğitim veren okul ve merkezlerin incelenmesi [Examination of schools and centers providing education to special or gifted children] (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Maltepe Üniversitesi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=vgQuFps_UKl1adnrPhMEzg&no=5uJmF_NH_W4FnYwkBlDTiA
Vrasidas, C. (2015). The rhetoric of reform and teachers' use of ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12149
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Yetik, S., Akyüz, H. İ., & Bardakçı, S. (2019). Eğitim fakültelerinde görev yapan öğretim elemanlarının güncel teknolojilere ilişkin farkındalıkları ve yararlanma durumları [Awareness of current technologies and utilization status of faculty members in education faculties]. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 164-192.
Yıldırım, F., & Akyüz, S. (2024). Investigation of digital burnout of Science and Art Center teachers and teachers working in schools. Trakya Journal of Education, 14(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380881000
Yiğit-Koyunkaya, M., & Tataroğlu-Taşdan, B. (2019). Evaluation of pre-service mathematics teachers' lesson plans in terms of technology integration. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 1137-1166. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.555139
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yasemin Gözüküçük, Birsen Bağçeci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
