The transformative impact of the project-based learning approach on students’ self-perceptions in a teacher training program
Blömeke, S., & Delaney, S. (2012). Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: A review of the State of Research. ZDM, 44(3), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0429-7
Buck Institute for Education. (2019). Online: https://www.pblworks.org/blog/gold-standard-pbl-essential-project-design-elements
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z
Cedefop. (2016). Rise of the machines. ESJ survey INSIGHTS, (č. 8)
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(02)00053-7
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157
Dweck, C. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2017). Mindset: Changing the way you think to fulfill your potential. Robinson.
Enderle, P., Dentzau, M., Roseler, K., Southerland, S., Granger, E., Hughes, R., Golden, B., & Saka, Y. (2014). Examining the influence of rets on science teacher beliefs and practice. Science Education, 98(6), 1077–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21127
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N. & Hyun, H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education McGraw-Hill Education, 704p.
Feldman, A., & Özalp, D. (2019). Science teachers’ ability to self-calibrate and the trustworthiness of their self-reporting. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(3), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2018.1560209
Hagevik, R., Aydeniz, M., & Rowell, C. G. (2012). Using action research in Middle -Level teacher education to evaluate and deepen the reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.006
HENDL, J. (2006). Přehled statistických metod zpracování dat. Analýza a metaanalýza dat. Praha: Portál, 2006. 696 s.
Hutner, T. L., & Markman, A. B. (2016). Proposing an operational definition of science teacher beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9480-5
Kaasila, R., & Lauriala, A. (2010). Towards a collaborative, interactionist model of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.023
KOMÁRIK, E. (2002). Metódy vedeckého poznávania človeka. Bratislava : Univerzita Komenského, 2002. 210 s.
Kotuľáková, K. (2019). Importance of teachers’ beliefs in the development of scientific literacy. Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology, 24(1–2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.2478/cdem-2019-0006
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for Project Based Learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.
Maderick, J. A., Zhang, S., Hartley, K., & Marchand, G. (2015). Preservice teachers and self-assessing digital competence. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(3), 326–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115620432
Meschede, N., Fiebranz, A., Möller, K., & Steffensky, M. (2017). Teachers’ professional vision, pedagogical content knowledge, and beliefs: On its relation and differences between pre-service and in-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.010
Monet, J. A., & Etkina, E. (2008). Fostering self-reflection and Meaningful learning: Earth science professional development for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9106-7
Moore-Russo, D. A., & Wilsey, J. N. (2014). Delving into the meaning of productive reflection: A study of future teachers’ reflections on representations of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, pp. 37, 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.10.002
NUCEM (2021). Research report of the analysis results from PIAAC online. Available on-line: https://piaac.nucem.sk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Statisticke-spracovanie-vyskumu-klucovych-kompetencii-a-postojov-pedagogickych-a-odbornych-zamestnancov-nizsieho-stredneho-vzdelavania_2021.pdf
Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-Supportive Teaching: What It Is, How to Do It. In Liu, W. Ch., Wang, J.Ch., Ryan, R. M., Eds., Building Autonomous Learners: Perspectives from Research and Practice using Self-Detrmination Theory. Springer. p. 129–152.
Reeve, J. (2006). What Teachers Say and Do to Support Students’ Autonomy During a Learning Activity. In Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006, vol. 98, pp. 209–218.
Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., Rappolt, G., & Strangman, N. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. ASCD.
Savasci, F., & Berlin, D. F. (2012). Science teacher beliefs and classroom practice related to constructivism in different school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9262-z
Stolp, S., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2017). Contributions of metacognitive and self-regulated learning theories to investigations of calibration of comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 7–31. Retrieved from https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/255
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.

Copyright (c) 2024 Pedagogical Perspective
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
Under this license:
-
Attribution (BY): You must give appropriate credit to the author(s), provide a reference to the source (journal and article citation), and indicate if changes were made.
-
NonCommercial (NC): You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
ShareAlike (SA): If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Downloads
Article Information
- Article Type Research Articles
- Submitted February 17, 2024
- Published April 29, 2024
- Issue 2024: Special Issue: Rethinking How We Train Teachers of Tomorrow TSTT 2023 International Conference
- Section Research Articles