Developing an association with daily life test for 5th-grade science education: Propagation of light unit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.94Keywords:
Associating with daily life, Context-based learning, Propagation of light, Test developmentAbstract
Students’ difficulties associating science topics and concepts with daily life continue from primary school to university. This study aims to develop an open-ended test to determine the level of 5th-grade students’ associating the topics related to the “Propagation of Light” unit with daily life events. The study employs a mixed-methods research model incorporating both qualitative and quantitative methods for test development and validation. To examine the validity of the test, pilot application was applied to 20 students in 6th grade. Then, the test was used on 119 students in 5th grade for actual application of the test. As a result of the study, a valid and reliable “Propagation of Light” unit daily life association test (PoLDAT) consisting of 10 open-ended questions was developed. According to the findings obtained from applying the developed test, it is noteworthy that misconceptions are intense with partial understanding of the unit on the propagation of light. As a result, the PoLDAT will serve measurement and evaluation purposes and enable students to realize the relationship between science subjects and daily life events by activating their thinking processes.
References
Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross‐age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147–165.
Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press.
Aktaş, N. (2023). The effect of context-based REACT teaching model on students’ level of associating science with daily life and their motivation toward science (Master’s thesis, Ordu Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
Arık Gungor, B., & Saracoglu, S. (2023). Content analysis of theses on context-based learning approach in science education. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 13(2), 564–598. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1118396
Aydın Gürler, S. (2022). Association level of the knowledge on “Pure Substances and Mixtures” of secondary school students with daily life. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 23(1), 822–862. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.918847
Ayvacı, H. Ş., Er Nas, S., & Dilber, Y. (2016). Effectiveness of the context-based guide materials on students’ conceptual understanding: “Conducting and insulating materials” sample. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 51–78.
Balkan Kıyıcı, F., & Aydoğdu, M. (2011). Determination of pre-service science teachers’ levels of relating the scientific knowledge to their daily lives. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 43–61.
Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context‐based chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999–1015.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context‐based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370.
Bodur, Ş., & Şahin, Ç. (2017). The relation between the secondary school 7th grade students’ learning styles and associating skills the science subjects to daily life. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 18, 65–79.
Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., & Pervukhina, I. (2021). Context-based testing as assessment tool in chemistry learning on university level. Education Sciences, 11(8), 450.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2010). Scientific research methods (6th edition). Pegem Akademi.
Campbell, B., & Lubben, F. (2000). Learning science through contexts: Helping pupils make sense of everyday situations. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 239–252.
Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile nicel veri analizi. Pegem Akademi.
Canpolat, E., & Ayyıldız, K. (2019). Level of 8th grade students' ability to relating science course with daily life. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 3(1), 21–39.
Chiappetta, E. L., Koballa, T. R., & Collette, A. T. (2002). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. Merrill.
Coştu, B., Ünal, S., & Ayas, A. (2007). The use of daily-life events in science teaching. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 8(1), 197–207.
Çelik, D., & Güler, M. (2013). Examination of realistic problem-solving skills of sixth grade students. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 20, 180–195.
Dede Er, T., Sen, O. F., Sari, U., & Celik, H. (2013). The level of association for primary school students between science and technology course and daily life. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(2), 209–216.
Demircioğlu, H., Bektaş, F., & Demircioğlu, G. (2018). The effect of teaching of topic of properties of liquids with context-based approach on students’ achievement. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 33, 13–25.
Demircioğlu, H., & Özdemir, R. (2019). The effect of context-based learning approach on prospective teachers' understanding of nanotechnology. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(14), 314–336. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.576978
Derman, İ., & Senemoğlu, N. (2020). Seventh-grade students’ levels of associating science courses with real life. Education and Science, 46(206), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.9178
Doğan, S., Kırvak, E., & Baran, Ş. (2004). The levels of secondary school students making connection between daily life and the knowledge gained during biology lectures. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 6(1), 57–63.
Elmas, R., & Geban, Ö. (2016). The effect of context-based chemistry instruction on 9th-grade students’ understanding of cleaning agents topic and their attitude toward the environment. Education and Science, 41(185). https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2016.5502
Feinstein, N. W., Allen, S., & Jenkins, E. (2013). Outside the pipeline: Reimagining science education for nonscientists. Science, 340(6130), 314–317.
Genç, M., Söğüt, S., Gün Şahin, E., & Zeynoğlu, E. (2023). A systematic review on context-based learning in science education. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 25(3), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.938861
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976.
Göçmençelebi, Ş. İ., & Özkan, M. (2011). Does the use of technology and reading scientific publications affect the ability to relate science lesson knowledge to daily life: A comparative study of Turkish primary school students. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 24(1), 287–296.
Gül, Ş., Yalmancı, S. G., & Yalmancı, E. (2017). The effect of REACT strategy in teaching of “Excretory System” subject. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.308057
Hançer, A. H., Şensoy, Ö., & Yıldırım, H. İ. (2003). An evaluation about the importance of contemporary science education at elementary schools and how this kind of science teaching must be. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 13(13), 80–88.
Hürcan, N., & Önder, İ. (2012, September). Determination of the relationships between the science concepts that the 7th grade primary school students learn in science and technology lessons and daily life. National Congress of Science and Mathematics Education, Niğde, September (pp. 27–30).
Kabuklu, Ü. N., & Kurnaz, M. A. (2019). Thematic review of context-based instruction studies made in Turkey in science education. Asian Journal of Instruction, 7(1), 32–53.
Karslı, M. D. (Ed.). (2012). Introduction to educational science (4th edition). Pegem Akademi.
Karslı, F., & Saka, Ü. (2017). The effect of the context-based approach on 5th grade students' conceptual understanding about “Getting to Know Foods.” Elementary Education Online, 16(3), 900–916. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330230
Karslı Baydere, F., & Aydın, E. (2019). Teaching “The Eye” topic through the explanation-assisted REACT strategy of the context-based approach. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 39(2), 755–791. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.345897
Karslı Baydere, F., & Kurtoğlu, S. (2020). The effect of REACT strategy on 5th grade students’ conceptual understanding of biological diversity. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 17(1), 1015–1041. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.800921
Keleş, İ. H., & Dede, H. (2020). Teaching “pure substances, mixtures and separation of mixtures” topics with REACT strategy. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 20(4), 1657–1675. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2020.20.58249-618735
Keskin, F., & Çam, A. (2019). The effectiveness of context-based REACT strategy on sixth grade students’ academic achievement and scientific literacy. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, (49), 38–59.
Kirman Bilgin, A., & Yiğit, N. (2017). Investigation of effectiveness of teaching materials based on REACT strategy on revelation of the relationship between "Density" concept and contexts. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 30(2), 495–519.
Korkmaz, Ö., & Buyruk, B. (2016). Students' correlation status of concepts of science and technology course in their daily lives. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education Faculty, 35(1), 159–172.
Magwilang, E. B. (2016). Teaching chemistry in context: Its effects on students' motivation, attitudes, and achievement in chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(4), 60–68.
Majid, A. N., & Rohaeti, E. (2018). The effect of context-based chemistry learning on student achievement and attitude. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 836–839.
Mercan, G., Gürlen, E., & Köseoğlu, P. (2019). Investigation of biology teacher candidates’ ability to associate status of scientific information. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(1), 320–343.
MoNE [MEB]. (2024). Science curriculum (Primary and secondary school grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8). Ankara: Presidency of the Board of Education and Discipline. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/ogretim-programlari/fen-bilimleri-dersi
Luyt, R. (2012). A framework for mixing methods in quantitative measurement development, validation, and revision: A case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 294–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811427912
Ormancı, Ü., & Çepni, S. (2018). The thematic review of relating with daily life studies in science education. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 350–381.
Ormancı, Ü., Çepni, S., & Ülger, B. B. (2020). Determining secondary school students’ understanding and relationship with daily life on cell subject. Journal of Science Mathematics Entrepreneurship and Technology Education, 3(2), 125–143.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.
Overton, T. (2007). Context and problem-based learning. New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences, (3), 7–12.
Park, J. W. (2004). Analyzing cognitive or non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics problem solving in an everyday context: An effort for successful problem solving in an everyday context. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 24(4), 774–784.
Pekdağ, B., Azizoğlu, N., Topal, F., Ağalar, A., & Oran, E. (2013). The effect of academic achievement on associating chemistry knowledge with everyday situations. Kastamonu Education Journal, 21(4), 1275–1286.
Pınar, M. A., & Dönel Akgül, G. (2023). Content analysis of graduate thesis studies on REACT strategy in science education in Turkey. Atlas Journal, 9(51), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8356523
Puspita, D. (2016). The effectiveness of contextual approach in terms of conceptual understanding and learning motivation of junior high school students. Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpm.v5i8.4606
Putri, M. E., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2019). The effect of application of REACT learning strategies on mathematics learning achievements: Empirical analysis on learning styles of junior high school students. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 231–237.
Quainoo, B. A., Otami, C. D., & Owusu, K. A. (2021). Effect of the REACT strategy on senior high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 696–716.
Ramsden, J. M. (1997). How does a context‐based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+? International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 697–710.
Sak, M., & Kaltakçı Gürel, D. (2019). Comparing elementary school students’ answers to the context-based and traditional questions in the topic of light with developed achievement tests. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 39(2), 655–679.
Sbhatu, D. B. (2021). Challenges of 20th century Ethiopian science education. Heliyon, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07157
Sheshtawy, O. M. M., Suudi, S. B., Hadi, M. A., Ramadan, S. B., & Ali, H. (2023). The effectiveness of the context-based learning approach in acquiring scientific concepts in science for primary school students. Educational Research and Innovation Journal, 3(10), 171–201.
Şahin, M. G., & Boztunç Öztürk, N. (2018). Scale development process in educational field: A content analysis research. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(1), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.375863
Şensoy, Ö., & Gökçe, B. (2017). The effect of the context-based learning approach on the achievement and motivations of students. Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 56, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS6997
Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 155–167.
Uğraş, M., Aydemir, S., & Asiltürk, E. (2017). Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ level of associating their chemistry knowledge with daily life and the relationship between these levels and their attitudes towards teaching science. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(4), 4539–4545.
Ülger, B. B., Ormancı, Ü., & Çepni, S. (2022). Associating the lesson plans developed by pre-service science teachers with daily life: A cell example. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 35(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.815461
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (11th edition). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yıldırım, G., & Gültekin, M. (2017). Applications of context-based learning in primary 4th class science and technology course. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 18, 81–101.
Yıldırım, N., & Maşeroğlu, P. (2016). Predict-observe-explain-based activities in the association of chemistry with the daily life and student views. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(1), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.47585
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pedagogical Perspective
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
