Early educational experiences and teacher gender bias in shaping female students' interest in Physics
Gender disparities in physics persist globally, with female participation in STEM fields remaining disproportionately low in Ethiopia. Drawing on Situated Expectancy-Value Theory (SEVT) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) as interpretive frameworks, this study examined how early educational experiences, teacher influence, and gender bias shape female students’ interest in physics in Kaffa Zone secondary schools in Southwest Ethiopia. A quantitative approach was employed to collect data from 352 female students using structured questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed construct validity (KMO = 0.847), and reliability was excellent (α = 0.951). Early educational experiences and exposure to female role models emerged as the strongest predictors of interest in physics. From a SEVT perspective, these findings suggest that formative experiences shape students’ expectations for success and subjective task value, while from an SCT perspective, they highlight the importance of mastery experiences and vicarious learning in developing self-efficacy. Curriculum approaches and sociocultural influences also contributed significantly. Notably, teacher influence and gender bias were not significant predictors, suggesting evolving teacher attitudes in this context. This study underscores the critical importance of early exposure to science, visible female role models, and inclusive curricula in fostering girls’ interest in physics.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. A. (2014). Introduction to research in education (9th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2012). My fair physicist? Feminine math and science role models demotivate young girls. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612440735
Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children's interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524
Bleiberg, J., Robinson, C. D., Bennett, E., & Loeb, S. (2025). The impact of tutor gender match on girls' STEM interest, engagement, and performance (EdWorkingPaper No. 25-1178). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/n6xz-cs89
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20241
Chen, X.-Y., & Rosenzweig, E. Q. (2026). Investigating academic and demographic similarities to career role models for motivating diverse college students in STEM. Learning and Individual Differences, 125, 102807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102807
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2016). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
Colclough, C., Rose, P., & Tembon, M. (2000). Gender inequalities in primary schooling: The roles of poverty and adverse cultural practice. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(99)00046-2
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Dasgupta, N. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in STEM: Stereotypes, identity, and motivation. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Egne, R. M. (2014). Gender equality in public higher education institutions of Ethiopia: The case of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 5(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2014-0001
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Giese, L., Tellhed, U., Björklund, F., & Kalucza, J. (2025). 'You have exactly what it takes': Two interventions for increasing women's self-efficacy and belongingness in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 50(3), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2025.2467827
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Haussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls' interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10048
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
Huang, Y. S., Rachlin, T. F., & Bian, L. (2026). Pretend play of scientists boosts young children's, especially girls', persistence in science. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 262, 106368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106368
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Lavy, V., & Sand, E. (2018). On the origins of gender gaps in human capital: Short- and long-term consequences of teachers' biases. Journal of Public Economics, 167, 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.09.007
Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2020). Cultural stereotypes and sense of belonging contribute to gender gaps in STEM. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 12(1), 152–198.
Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children's gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039
Miranda, I. (2025). Unleashing girls' potential through STEM exploration. School Science and Mathematics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18376
Monteiro, R., Coelho, L., Daniel, F., Simões, I., & Gomes da Silva, A. (2025). If you don't see inequality, you cannot teach equality: What is missing in STEM teachers' perceptions for an equality pedagogy in STEM teaching? Social Sciences, 14(9), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14090563
Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls and physics: Continuing barriers to 'belonging'. The Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170600909753
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Digest of education statistics: 2022. U.S. Department of Education.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Packard, B. W. L. (2016). Successful STEM mentoring initiatives for underrepresented students: A research-based guide for faculty and administrators. Stylus Publishing.
Paul, B. (2026). Unveiling gender dynamics in introductory physics labs. Physics Education, 61(1), 015035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae2f14
Paul, B., Chakraborty, S., & Sharma, G. (2025). Breaking barriers: Investigating gender dynamics in introductory physics lab classes. Georgia Journal of Science, 83(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.15049
Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Zittleman, K. R. (2010). Still failing at fairness: How gender bias cheats girls and boys in school and what we can do about it. Scribner.
Semela, T. (2010). Who is joining physics and why? Factors influencing the choice of physics among Ethiopian university students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(3), 319–340.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Tenenbaum, H. R., & Leaper, C. (2003). Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities? Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.34
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls' and women's education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2024). Securing STEM futures for women: Changing the equation. UNESCO Publishing.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
Weber, R., & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 961–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.961
World Economic Forum. (2024). Global gender gap report 2024. World Economic Forum.
Copyright (c) 2026 Tewodros Adaro Gatissa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Article Information
- Article Type Research Articles
- Submitted December 15, 2025
- Accepted March 24, 2026
- Published March 30, 2026
- Issue Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Pedagogical Perspective (March)
- Section Research Articles
