Enhancing direct instruction through an adapted K-W-L strategy
Observations of pre-service teachers (PSTs) conducting Direct Instruction (DI) lessons reveal low levels of learner engagement, with instruction remaining predominantly teacher-centred. This conceptual pedagogical paper proposes a modification of Ogle's (1986) Know-Want-Learned (K-W-L) strategy, reformulated as K-W-L in Direct Instruction (K-W-L in DI). This is intended to help PSTs bolster learner engagement and implement inclusive teaching practices when using DI as a teaching strategy. Incorporating the K-W-L framework into DI activates learners’ prior knowledge, promotes alignment with the lesson objective through structured teacher questions, and provides means for reflective learning through formative assessment. The K-W-L strategy in the DI framework can support differentiated instruction and scaffold learning within Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development. Although numerous adaptations of the original K-W-L strategy have been applied across disciplines to improve comprehension of expository texts, K-W-L in DI uniquely positions the K-W-L chart as an instructional tool within direct teaching. The three sections of the K-W-L chart facilitate the organisation of lessons into three phases: before, during, and post-engagement with new material. These three sections align, respectively, with the introduction, development (body), and consolidation stages of a DI lesson. This alignment enables the K-W-L chart to function as a structured scaffold for guided learning when utilising the DI teaching strategy. The proposed framework embeds teacher-generated questions, grounded in Bloom’s revised taxonomy, to facilitate differentiated instruction and sustained learner participation throughout the lesson. This study underscores the value of preparing future teachers to use K-W-L in DI as both a planning and instructional medium to improve student engagement and inclusive teaching practices when presenting DI lessons.
Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. Education 3–13, 34(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270600898893
Agustin, W., Wahyudin, A. Y., & Isnaini, S. (2021). Language learning strategies and academic achievement of English Department students. Journal of Arts and Education, 1(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.33365/jae.v1i1.34
Bertram, C. A., Mthiyane, C. C. N., & Naidoo, J. (2021). The tension between curriculum coverage and quality learning: The experiences of South African teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 81, 102353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102353
Bogdanović, I. Z., Stanisavljević, J. D., Rodić, D. D., Rončević, T. N., & Zouhor, Z. A. (2022). The impact of using the modified Know-Want-Learn strategy in physics teaching on students' metacognition. South African Journal of Education, 42(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42n4a2096
Cantrell, R. J., Fusaro, J. A., & Dougherty, E. A. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of journal writing on learning social studies: A comparative study. Reading Psychology, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/027027100278310
Carr, E., & Ogle, D. (1987). K-W-L Plus: A strategy for comprehension and summarization. Journal of Reading, 30(7), 626–631. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40031872
Department of Higher Education and Training. (2015). Policy on minimum requirements for teacher education qualifications. Republic of South Africa.
Diasti, K. S., Murniati, C. T., & Hartono, H. (2023). The implementation of K-W-L strategy in EFL students' reading comprehension. Journal of English Teaching, 9(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v9i2.4676
Dubinsky, J. M., & Hamid, O. (2024). The neuroscience of active learning and direct instruction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 163, Article 105737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105737
Fitriani, R., Tahrun, T., & Firdaus, M. (2025). Influence of K-W-L strategy and reading habit on students' reading comprehension achievement. Alacrity Journal, 5(2), 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.52121/alacrity.v5i2.846
Greenwood, R. (2018). Pupil involvement in planning topics using K-W-L grids: Opinions of teachers, student teachers and pupils. Educational Studies, 45(4), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509773
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
Hoffman, S., & Maarman, R. (2024). Freedom of teachers using CAPS: A capability analysis of a Western Cape school. South African Review of Education, 29(2), 86–103. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-sare_v29_n2_a7
Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry (Vol. 5). Routledge.
Killen, R., & Hattingh, A. (2022). Teaching strategies for quality teaching and learning (3rd ed.). Juta.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Mahan, K. R. (2022). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879
Miller, R. (2011). Vygotsky in perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Mokgwathi, M. S., Graham, M. A., & de Villiers, J. J. R. (2023). School infrastructure challenges in South Africa: Experiences of high school principals and teachers. South African Journal of Education, 43(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n4a2303
Ness, M. (2015). The question is the answer: Supporting student-generated queries in elementary classrooms. Rowman & Littlefield.
Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20199156
Ordu, U. B. A. (2021). The role of teaching and learning aids/methods in a changing world. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the Bulgarian Comparative Education Society (BCES). BCES.
Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. H. (2010). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Wadsworth.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). Critical thinking: The art of Socratic questioning (Part III). Journal of Developmental Education, 31(3), 34–35.
Rahmasari, B. S., Munir, A., & Nugroho, H. A. (2024). The role of peer tutoring integrated with K-W-L charts in the development of students' inferential skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2335810. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2335810
Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–19. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/Rosenshine.pdf
Schur, Y., & Guberman, A. (2024). Conceptual change of 'teaching' among experienced teachers after studying attentive teaching. Education Sciences, 14(231), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030231
Shammas, N. (2023). An exploration of direct instruction: Why teaching matters. In H. B. Al Naimiy & I. Shehadi (Eds.), COVID-19: Future trends in education post (pp. 319–337). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-9
Shvarts, A., & Bakker, A. (2019). The early history of the scaffolding metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1574306
Sippola, A. E. (1995). K-W-LS. The Reading Teacher, 48(6), 542–543. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20201490
Spencer, A., Causey, C. B., Ernest, J. M., & Barnes, G. F. (2020). Using student generated questions to foster twenty-first century learning: International collaboration in Uganda. Excellence in Education Journal, 9(1), 57–84.
West, J., & Meier, C. (2020). Overcrowded classrooms – The Achilles heel of South African education? South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v10i1.617
Wu, L., Liu, Y., How, M.-L., & He, S. (2023). Investigating student-generated questioning in a technology-enabled elementary science classroom: A case study. Education Sciences, 13(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020158

Copyright (c) 2026 Tracey Herman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Article Information
- Article Type Research Articles
- Submitted November 3, 2025
- Published March 30, 2026
- Issue Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Pedagogical Perspective (March)
- Section Research Articles


