Distributed leadership as a potential strategy for the management of environmental education curriculum in secondary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.62Anahtar Kelimeler:
Distributed Leadership, Environmental Education, Leadership, Sustainability, Stakeholder engagementÖzet
Environmental education plays a critical role in equipping learners with the knowledge and skills needed to address environmental challenges and promote sustainability. However, in South African secondary schools, the implementation of environmental education faces obstacles such as limited resources, curriculum constraints, and insufficient stakeholder involvement. This empirical research paper explores the potential of distributed leadership as a strategic approach to advancing environmental education. Distributed leadership, which emphasises shared decision-making and collaboration, offers a transformative model for promoting environmental awareness and sustainability initiatives. The study analyses successful examples of distributed leadership globally and within South Africa to uncover its transformative possibilities. Furthermore, the paper examines the benefits of adopting distributed leadership in fostering environmental consciousness and action within the school community. Through stakeholder engagement and collaboration, distributed leadership can lead to more effective environmental education interventions. The findings and recommendations from this research contribute to the advancement of sustainable environmental education strategies in South Africa and beyond.
Referanslar
Ajayi, O. V. (2017). Distinguish between Primary Sources of Data and Secondary Sources of Data (Doctoral dissertation). Benue State University, Makurdi.
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative sociology, 42(2), 139-160.
Benjamin, D., & Adu, E. O. (2019). Challenges teachers face in the integration of Environ-mental Education into the South African curriculum. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 3(10), 157-166.
Bruttel, L., & Fischbacher, U. (2013). Taking the initiative. What characterizes leaders? European Economic Review, 64, 147-168.
Busetto, L., Wick, W. & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(14), 1-10.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. [5th Ed.]. Boston, MA, Pearson.
Crossman, A. (2018). Understanding Purposive Sampling: Purposive Sampling Method and Its Applications. Accessed from https://www.thoughtco.com on 03 December 2022.
Dampson, G. D., & Frempong, E. (2018). School Climate and Academic Growth: Investigating One State’s School Performance Report. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 1(2), 1-12.
Dawadi, S. (2020). Thematic analysis approach: A step-by-step guide got ELT research practitioners. Journal of NELTA, 25(1-2), 62-71.
Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Management in Education, 30(4), 147-154.
DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semi-structured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7.
Elliott, P., Dueck, C., & Rodenburg, J. (2020). Activating Teacher Candidates in Community-Wide Environmental Education: The Pathway to Stewardship and Kinship Project. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 23(1), 85-101.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, Teachers College Press.
Grant, C. (2017). ‘Distributed leadership in South Africa: yet another passing fad or a robust theoretical tool for investigating school leadership practice?’ School Leadership & Management, 37(5), 457-75.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 317–338.
Gronn, P. (2009). Leadership configurations. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(4), 350–364.
Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 25-48.
Ham, S. H., & Sewing, D. R. (1988). Barriers to environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 19(2), 17-24.
Humphrey, E. (2010). Distributed leadership and its impact on teaching and learning. [Published PhD, Thesis]. Maynooth University, Ireland.
Hallinger, P. (2011). "Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research". Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
Harris, A. (2004). Distributed Leadership and School Improvement Leading or Misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11-24.
Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: Different perspectives. New York, Springer.
Harris, L. R. (2011). Secondary Teachers' Conceptions of Student Engagement: Engagement in Learning or in Schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 376-386.
Harris, A., Jones, M., & Ismail, N. (2022). Distributed leadership: taking a retrospective and contemporary view of the evidence base. School leadership & management, 42(5), 438-456.
Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving Schools Through Teacher leadership, Maidenhead, Open University Press.
Hebe, H. (2019). Locating the Position of Environmental Education in the South African School Curriculum: The Case of Grade R. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9), em1750.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Keer, H. (2009). The Influence of Distributed Leadership on Teachers’ Organizational Commitment: A Multilevel Approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40-52.
Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999) Changing Leadership for Changing Times. Open University Press, Philadelphia.
Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529–561.
Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta‐analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387–423.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 471–502.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. Earl, L. Watson, N., & Fullan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership on a large scale: the case of England’s National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. Journal of School Management and Leadership, 24(1), 57-79.
Liu, J., Qiang, F. & Kang, H. (2023). Distributed leadership, self-efficacy and wellbeing in schools: A study of relations among teachers in Shanghai. Humanities and Social Sciences Communication, 10, 248.
Liu, Y., & Watson, S. (2020). Whose leadership role is more substantial for teacher professional collaboration, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: a lens of distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(6), 1082-1110.
Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Learning from Leadership: Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning. New York: The Wallace Foundation. Accessed from: http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/Documents/Investigating-the-Links-to-Improved-Student-Learning.pdf on 15 May 2023.
MacBeath, J. (2005). Leadership as Distributed: A matter of practice. School Leadership and Management, 25(4), 349–366.
Magnate, F. R. (2023). Exploring the Mediating Role on Distributive and Instructional Leadership of Teacher Organizational Satisfaction to Commitment: A Structural Equation Model. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 14(5), 406–418.
Makaye, J. (2015). School Clusters as Sites for Instructional Leadership: A Case of the Better Schools Programme of Zimbabwe (Doctoral dissertation). University of the Free State, Bloemfontein.
Moonsamy, J. (2010). 'Teacher leadership made visible': a case study of three teacher leaders in a semi-urban secondary school in KwaZulu-Natal. A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Education. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.
Oduro, G. K. (2004). ‘Distributed leadership’ in schools: what English head teachers say about the ‘pull’ and ‘push’factors. In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Manchester, 16-18. Accessed from: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/eucol/documents/00003673.htm on 05 May 2023.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.
Penuel, W. R., Coburn, C. E., & Gallagher, D. J. (2007). Creating research–practice partnerships in education. Harvard Education Press.
Shabalala, N. P. (2023). Exploring Strategies for Environmental Education Interventions Through Distributed Leadership in Secondary Schools in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy (IJESP), 4(1), 15-27.
Shabalala, N.P., Hebe, H. N., & Mnguni, L. (2023). Characterization Of Curriculum Leadership By South African School Leaders And Teachers In Environmental Education. Problems Of Educatıon In The 21st Century, 81(3), 401.
Shabalala, N.P., Hebe, H. N., & Mnguni, L. (2023. Distributed Leadership: A Potential Agency for Traversing Power Relations asImpediments to Curriculum Transformation and Implementation of Environmental Education. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA Shabalala, 9(1), 29-57. Accessed from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371206252_Distributed_Leadership_A_Potential_Agency_for_Traversing_Power_Relations_as_Impediments_to_Curriculum_Transformation_and_Implementation_of_Environmental_Education on March 23 2024.
Shukla, S. 2020. Concept of population and sample. [Online]. Accessed from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346426707_CONCEPT_OF_POPULATION_AND_SAMPLE on 12 March 2023.
Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teachers' views of the effects of school organization on their work. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 397–418.
Smylie, M. A., & Denny, J. W. (1990). Teacher perceptions of school-based management. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(1), 49–61.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30, 23-28.
Squires, A., Gerchow, L., Ma, C., Liang, E., Trachtenberg, M., & Miner, S. (2023). A multi-language qualitative study of limited English proficiency patient experiences in the United States. PEC Innovation, 2, 100177.
Tilbury, D., Stevenson, R. B., Fien, J., & Schreuder, D. (Eds.). (2002). Education and Sustainability: Responding to the Global Challenge. Gland, Switzerland, International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Tilbury, D. (2004). Environmental Education for Sustainability: A Force for Change in Higher Education. In P. B. Corcoran, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability: Problematics, Promise and Practice (pp. 97-112). Netherland, Kluwer Academic. Accessed from: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48515-x_9 on 10 June 2023.
Torres, G. D. (2018). Distributed Leadership and Teacher Job Satisfaction in Singapore. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(1), 127-142.
Tshautshau, A. (2013). Environmental Education in SA: Are we doing enough? Accessed from Environmental Education in SA: Are we doing enough | News24 on 20 February 2023
UNESCO. (1978). Tbilisi Declaration. Accessed from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000077705 on 03 February 2023.
Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson-Prentice Hall.
Zheng, X., Yin, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). ‘The Relationship between Distributed Leadership and Teacher Efficacy in China: The Mediation of Satisfaction and Trust’. The Asia- Pacific Education Researcher, 28(6), 509-18.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2024 Pedagogical Perspective
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.