Classroom assessment model suggestion for community service practices course: PROFESS T
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2023.559.5Anahtar Kelimeler:
Community service practices, classroom assessment, formative evaluation, service-learning, processfolio, self-assessment, pre-service social studies teachersÖzet
Community service practices course is a compulsory course aims to provide pre-service teachers with a sense of social responsibility theoretically and practically, and aims to develop cooperation, collaboration, effective communication and self-assessment skills during practice. In the context of current studies, the measurement and assessment system of the course should include process assessment, the introduction of the assessment system at the beginning of the lesson, presenting a standard assessment tool example, individual assessment as well as group assessment, use of alternative assessment tools. This study aims to examine the opinions of social studies pre-service teachers regarding an exemplary classroom assessment model developed for the community service practices course. In this context, the action research method, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. Fifteen social studies pre-service teachers participated in the study. The data were collected through a semi-structured interview form and analyzed with the descriptive analysis technique. As a result of the study, an example of a classroom assessment model, in which each one is a significant component, has emerged for pre-service social studies teachers within the scope of the CSP course. The name of this model is PROFESS T. PROFESS T is a classroom assessment tool derived from the words processfolio (PRO), formative evaluation (FE), service-learning (S), self-assessment (S), and transparency (T). It also means professional transparency. In evaluations, it means “we are not transparent; we must be transparent.”
Referanslar
Akkuş, Z. (2014). Views of preservice teachers of social studies about the assessment and evaluation activities based on constructive approach. The Journal of Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute, 31. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/susbed/issue/61811/924670
Aslanoğlu, A. E. (2017). Assessment of the individual in a group: Peer and self-assessment. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 34(2). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/buje/issue/37026/424752
Assessment for Learning Assessment Reform Group (2002). Pamphlet assessment for learning–beyond the black Box. http://www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk
Aykırı, K. (2022). What is Not A Community Service Practices Course? A Review Of Existing Problems. Journal of Education and New Approaches, 5(2), 266-283. https://doi.org/10.52974/jena.1215391
Ballard, S., M., & Elmore, B. (2009). A labor of love: constructing a service-learning syllabus. Journal of Effective Teaching, 9(3),
Bell, B., & Bronwen, C. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Kluwer Academic.
Brookhart, M., S. (2001). Successful students’ formative and summative uses of assessment information. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940123775
Çalışkan, H., Uymaz, M., & Tekin, D. (2013). The evaluation of the competency of social studies teachers candidates’ regarding measurement and evaluation methods. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.581
Community Volunteers Foundation (2013). Üniversitelerde sosyal sorumluluk ve sosyal girişimcilik pilot projesi. https://www.tog.org.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2019/01/2 Universitelerde_Sosyal_Sorumluluk_Rapor.pdf
Costello, P., J., M. (2003). Action research. Continuum.
Council of Higher Education/CHE (2011). Community service practices directive. https://docplayer.biz.tr/405543-Topluma-hizmet-uygulamalari-yonergesi.html
Ekşi, Z., & Cinoğlu, M. (2012). An evaluation of the communıty service applications course. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cbayarsos/issue/4066/53629
Fritz, J., M. (2002). A little bit of sugar: Integrated service-learning courses. Sociological Practice, 4(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/43735969
Furco, A. (1999). Self-assessment rubric for the institutionalization of service-learning in higher education. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceslgen/12
Gelmez-Burakgazi, S. (2018). Volunteering: Evaluation of community service learning program. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.410893
Glesne, C. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research. (Trans. Ed. A. Ersoy ve P. Yalçınoğlu). Anı Publishing.
Gürol, A., & Özercan, M., G. (2010). Determining the views on the implementation of the Community Service Practice course. In the 9th National Primary Teacher Education Symposium (539-544). Elazığ.
Hoş-Ercin, N. (2011). Determination of lecrurers’ and pre-services teachers’ knowledge, skills and experiences about community service practise course. [Unpublished master’s thesis] Karadeniz Tecnical University, Institution of Education Sciences. [Thesis no: 300392].
İzci, E., Göktaş, Ö., & Şad, S., N. (2014). Prospective teachers’ views and perceived efficacy regarding alternative measurement and evaluation. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 15(2). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefad/issue/59460/854333
Jonsson, A. (2014). Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.875117
Kaf-Hasırcı, Ö., & Sarı, M. (2013). An analysis of instructors and teacher candidates’ views on community service practices course in the context of democratic citizenship education. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 3(5), 25-42. Retrieved from https://www.ijocis.com/index.php/ijocis/article/view/97
Kaye, C., B. (2014). The complete guide to service learning. Free Spirit Publishing.
Kearney, K., R. (2004). Students’ self-assessment of learning through service-learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.5688/aj680129
Kesten, A. (2012). Evaluation of the community service practices course from the perspective of teacher candidates and lecturers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(3).
Korkmaz, S. (2015). Prospective english language teacher’s views on the implemantation process and the outcomes of community service practices course. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Institute of Education Sciences. [Thesis no: 399330].
Kop, Y. (2017). Encountered problems and solution recommendations about project development process at community service practices. In R. Efe et al., (Ed.) Developments in Social Sciences, 131-140. St. Kliment Ohrıdskı Unıversıty Press.
Kuran, K. (2013). Evaluation of the community service practices course according to the opinions of primary school teacher candidates. In the V. International Türkiye Educational Research Congress (581-591). Çanakkale: Türkiye.
Küçükoğlu, A. (2012). Service learning in Turkey: Yesterday and today. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.015
Küçükoğlu, A., Kaya, H. İ., Bay, E., Taşgın, A., & Ozan, C. (2010). Community service practices as an approach that supports social entrepreneurship and participation in teacher training. II. International Türkiye Educational Research Congress, 29 April-2 May. Antalya
Metin, M. & Özmen, H. (2010). Prospective teachers’ views about formative assessment. Journal of National Education, 40(187). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/36197/407045
Molaie, S., Raby, F., & Hartwell, L. M. (2016). A multiple-intelligence approach to creativity in ESP courses. Etudes En Didactique Des Langues, 27.
Nicolaidou, I. (2012). Can process portfolios affect students’ writing self-efficacy?. International Journal of Educational Research, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.08.002
National Service-Learning Clearinhouse (2009). K-12 service-learning project planning toolkit. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/20602092/k-12-service-learning-project-planning-toolkit-national-ffa-
National Youth Leadership Council (2018). The IPARD framework. https://gsn.nylc.org/clearinghouse/results?key=&type=&attrs=33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40
Özdemir, S. (2011). Evaluation of community service practices course in education faculties. In International Higher Education Congress: New Trends and Challenges 2217-2224.
Robinson, M. (1995). Alternative assessment techniques for teachers. Music Educators Journal, 81(5). https://doi.org/10.2307/3398853
Seban, D. (2013). Learning by serving society in teacher education according to advisor faculty members. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 42(2). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cuefd/issue/4136/54290
Settiawan, D., & Hilmawan, R. (2016). Increasing transparency in assessment to improve students ‘ learning at Language Development Centre of UIN Suska Riau. In PROSIDING ICTTE FKIP UNS 2015, 364–368.
Silveira, J., M., Beauregard, J., & Bull, T. (2017). Development of the processfolio: Promoting preservice music teacher reflection through authentic assessment. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717697632
Uçan, Y., E., Yiğit, A., Toprak, E., & Tabak, G. (2009, Ekim). Evaluation of the community service practices course according to the opinions of pre-service teachers. 18th National Educational Sciences Congress. Aydın: Türkiye.
Yanık, F. (2019). Determination of social responsibility levels of candidates teacher taking community service pratices course and evaluation of their views about the course. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Atatürk University, Institute of Education Sciences. [Thesis no: 584749].
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.
Wolfe, R., E. (2013). Process-folios: Peeking into a student’s head. https://studentsatthecenterhub.org/resource/process-folios/
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Sürüm
- 2023-12-07 (2)
- 2023-06-21 (1)
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 Pedagogical Perspective
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
