Bibliometric analysis of studies on controversial issues

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.82

Keywords:

Controversial issues, Bibliometric analysis, Social studies

Abstract

Controversial issues are complex issues where societies face dilemmas. When controversial issues come to the agenda, an environment that can cause polarization in society can be created. Therefore, controversial issues are seen as taboo topics in educational settings. However, both international non-governmental organizations and academic studies show that bringing controversial issues into the classroom environment develops higher order thinking skills. There are many controversial topics in history, social studies and science courses. Studies on controversial issues show changes in the perspective on controversial issues. Rather than whether these topics should be included in classrooms, studies on why it is important to include these topics, how they should be included and suggestions for solutions to overcome the obstacles encountered stand out today. This study aims to map the studies on the concept of controversial issues based on quantitative data. In addition, the study aims to provide researchers with a systematic summary of the studies on controversial issues using bibliometric analysis and to reveal the trends and gaps related to the concept. As the unit of analysis, the bibliometric data of the studies scanned in the Web of Science database and published between 1980 and 2024 were taken into consideration. Looking at the distribution of 680 studies on controversial issues according to the years of publication, it is seen that there has been an increase in the number of studies on controversial issues in recent years.

References

Al Badri, S. (2015). Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom. Citizenship Education Research Journal (CERJ), 5(1), 73–83.

Aynuz, A., & Memişoğlu, H. (2022). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmen Adaylarının Tartışmalı Konular ve Öğretimine Yönelik Görüşleri. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 89. https://doi.org/10.29228/JASSS.57427

Boss, U. (2018). Exploring the Complexities of Integrating Socioscientific Issues in Science Teaching [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis]. Linnaeus University, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.

Davies, L. (2006). Global citizenship: Abstraction or framework for action? Educational Review, 58(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500352523

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

Espeja, A. G., & Lagarón, D. C. (2015). Socio-scientific Issues (SSI) in Initial Training of Primary School Teachers: Pre-service Teachers’ Conceptualization of SSI and Appreciation of the Value of Teaching SSI. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 196, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.015

Euroclio. (2020). Learning to Disagree: Teachers’ Guides.

Hammer, A. (2023a). Addressing controversial issues in religious education by enacting and rehearsing democracy through Forum Theatre: student perspectives. British Journal of Religious Education, 45(4), 404–414.

Hammer, A. (2023b). Using forum theatre to address homosexuality as a controversial issue in religious education. British Journal of Religious Education, 45(1), 23–33.

Hammer, A., & Lenz, C. (2024). Exploring teacher agency to address controversial issues in religious education - a forum theatre and action research approach. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Researc, 68(2), 306–319.

Hand, M., & Levinson, R. (2012). Discussing Controversial Issues in the Classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(6), 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00732.x

Harwood, A. M., & Hahn, C. L. (n.d.). Controversial Issues in the Classroom. ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education Bloomington IN.

Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2018). Students ’ Emotive Reasoning Through Place-Based Environmental Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1

Hess, D. (2008). Controversial issues and democratic discourse. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education (pp. 124–136).

Hess, D. (2009). Controversy in the Classroom. Routledge.

Jan van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2012). VOSviewer Manual. Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.5.2. www.vosviewer.com.

Kerr, D., & Huddleston, T. (2015). Teaching Controversial Issues Through Education for Democratic Citizenship and Human Rights. Council of Europe.

Kim, G., Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2019). The Effects of Community-Based Socioscientific Issues Program ( SSI-COMM ) on Promoting Students ’ Sense of Place and Character as Citizens. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09976-1

Mogutov, M., & Wansink, B. G. J. (2023). Dealing with parents when teaching sensitive and controversial issues. Euroclio.

Myers, J. P. (2006). Rethinking the social studies curriculum in the context of globalization: Education for global citizenship in the U.S. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(3), 370–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2006.10473313

Nuangchalerm, P., & Kwuanthong, B. (2010). Teaching “Global Warming” Through Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction. Asian Social Science, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n8p42

Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072746

Oxfam. (2006). Teaching Controversial Guides.

Pace, L. J. (2021). Hard Questions Learning to Teach Controversial Issues. by Rowman & Littlefield.

Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988-2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 62–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2002

Wang, H. H., Hong, Z. R., Liu, S. C., & Lin, H. S. (2018). The Impact of Socio-scientific Issue Discussions on Student Environmentalism. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(12).

Yahaya, J. M., Zain, A. N., & Karpudewan, M. (2012). Understanding Socioscientific Issues in a Low Literate Society for the Achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 6(12), 3372–3375. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1085956

Yazıcı, S., & Seçgin, F. (2010). Tartışmalı Konular ve Öğretimine İlişkin Bir Çalışma. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(12), 488–501. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301765358

Zimmerman, J., & Robertson, E. (2017). The Controversy Over Controversial Issues. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(4). kappanonline.org

Downloads

Published

27-12-2024

How to Cite

Elvan, Özlem, & Öztürk, D. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of studies on controversial issues. Pedagogical Perspective, 3(2), 420–429. https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.82

Issue

Section

Articles