Enhancing inclusive teaching. A teacher professional development research grounded in UDL principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.37Anahtar Kelimeler:
Agentivity, Inclusive education;, Lower secondary school teachers;, Participatory research;, Universal Design for LearningÖzet
The international scientific literature emphasizes the importance of inclusive education, which places the valorization of all diversities at the core of every learning environment. It also highlights the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as an educational framework that promotes accessibility in learning, enabling all students to fully participate regardless of their abilities by designing flexible and customizable educational material. In light of this, the UDL can serve as a model for crafting educational pathways aimed at supporting the academic success of all individuals while promoting full participation in creating a new democratic educational culture oriented towards equity, universality, and belonging. Against this background, the paper focuses on the implementation phases of a Teacher Professional Development Research (TPDR) pathway involving a group of in-service teachers in UDL approaches within lower secondary education. Its objective is to assess whether this pathway leads to an increase in inclusive practices in the classroom, a positive change in teachers' perception of their professional agency, and a positive impact on students' perception of their learner agency. The research aims, on the one hand, to contribute to the scientific literature on teacher professional development and inclusive education and, on the other hand, to promote the co-construction of knowledge within the teachers' community of practice, which is significant as it is deeply rooted in the real context, fostering transformative change in teaching practices and inclusive processes from an emancipatory perspective.
Referanslar
Agrusti, G., & Dodman, M. (2021). Evaluating the impact of “Ricerca-Formazione” on teachers’ professional development. Methodological issues and operational models. RicercAzione, 13(2), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.32076/RA13202
Aiello, P., Sharma, U., & Sibilio M. (2016). La centralità delle percezioni del docente nell’agire didattico inclusivo. Perché una formazione docente in chiave semplessa?. [The centrality of the teacher's perceptions in inclusive didactic action. Why a teacher training in a semplex key?] Italian Journal of Educational Research, 9(16), 11- 21.
Ainscow, M., Booth, T., Dyson, A., Farrell, P., Frankham, J., Gallannaugh, F., Howes, A., & Smith, R. (2006). Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. Routledge.
Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A Content Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39-56. http://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Alsalem M. (2015). Considering and supporting the implementation of universal design for learning among teachers of students who are deaf and hard of hearing in Saudi Arabia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/213413592.pdf
Aquario, D., Pais, I., & Ghedin, E. (2017). Accessibilità alla conoscenza e Universal Design. Uno studio esplorativo con docenti e studenti universitari. [Knowledge accessibility and Universal Design. An exploratory study with university teachers and students]. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 5(2), 93-105.
Asquini, G. (Ed.) (2018). La Ricerca-Formazione. Temi, esperienze, prospettive. [The Teacher Professional Development Research. Themes, experiences, perspectives]. Franco Angeli.
Baldacci, M., Nigris, E., & Riva, M.G. (Eds.). (2020). Idee per la formazione degli insegnanti. [Teacher Training Ideas]. Franco Angeli.
Biesta, G. (2015). How does a competent teacher become a good teacher? On judgement, wisdom and virtuosity in teaching and teacher education. In R. Heilbronn & L. Foreman-Peck (Eds), Philosophical perspectives on the future of teacher education (pp. 3-22). Wiley Blackwell.
Biesta, G. (2017). The Future of Teacher Education: Evidence, Competence or Wisdom? In M, A. Peters, B. Cowie & I. Menter (Eds.), A Companion to Research in Teacher Education (pp. 435-453). Springer.
Bocci, F. (2018). L’insegnante inclusivo e la sua formazione: una questione aperta nell’ottica dei Disability Studies. [The inclusive teacher and their training: an open question from the perspective of Disability Studies]. In R. Medeghini, E. Valtellina, B. A. Ferri, F. Monceri, D. Goodley, T. Titchkosky, G. Vadalà, V. Migliarini, S. D'Alessio, F. Bocci, & A. Marra, Disability Studies e inclusione. Per una lettura critica delle politiche e pratiche educative. [Disability Studies and inclusion. For a Critical Reading of Educational Policies and Practices]. (pp. 141-172). Erickson.
Bocci, F. (2021). Pedagogia speciale come pedagogia inclusiva. Itinerari istituenti di un modo di essere della scienza dell’educazione. [Special pedagogy as inclusive pedagogy. Itineraries establishing a way of being of the science of education]. Guerini Scientifica.
Bonaiuti, G. (2014). Le strategie didattiche. [Teaching strategies]. Carocci.
Booth, T., Nes, K., & Strømstad, M. (2003). Developing inclusive teacher education? In T. Booth, K. Nes & M. Strømstad (Eds.), Developing inclusive teacher education (pp. 9-22). Routledge.
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2011). Index for Inclusion: Developing Learning and Participation in Schools (3rd ed.). Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
Buysse, A. (2011). Une modélisation de la régulation et des mediations dans la construction des savoirs professionnels des enseignants. [A model of regulation and mediation in the construction of teachers' professional knowledge]. In P. Maubant, S. Martineau (Eds.), Fondements des pratiques professionnelles des enseignants. [Foundations of Teachers' Professional Practices], (pp. 267-308). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Calvert, L. (2016). Moving from compliance to agency: What teachers need to make professional learning work. OH, Learning Forward & NCTAF. https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/moving-from-compliance-to-agency.pdf
Capp, M.J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074
CAST (2018). UDL Guidelines version 2.2. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
Catalfamo, A. (2016). Applicabilità dello Universal Design for Learning in ambito italiano. Riflessioni a margine. [Applicability of Universal Design for Learning in the Italian context. Reflections on the sidelines]. In G. Savia (Ed.), Universal Design for Learning. Progettazione universale per l’apprendimento e didattica inclusiva. [Universal Design for Learning and inclusive teaching]. (pp. 97-108). Erickson.
Chiappetta Cajola, L., Ciraci, A. (Eds.). (2013). Didattica inclusiva. Quali competenze per l’insegnante?. [Inclusive teaching. What competencies for the teacher?]. Armando.
Cologon, K. (2019). Towards Inclusive Education: A Necessary Process of Transformation. Macquarie University for Children and Young People with Disability Australia.
Cottini, L. (2017). Didattica speciale e inclusione scolastica. [Special education and school inclusion]. Carocci.
Creig, S.L., Smith, S.J., & Frey, B.B. (2019). Professional development with universal design for learning. Supporting teachers as learners to increase implementation of UDL. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1685563
Creswell, J.W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. In S. Hisser- Biber & R. Burke Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry (pp. 57-71). Oxford University Press.
D’Alessio, S., Medeghini, R., Vadalà, G., & Bocci. F. (2015). L’approccio dei Disability Studies per lo sviluppo delle pratiche scolastiche inclusive in Italia. [The Disability Studies approach for the development of inclusive school practices in Italy]. In R. Vianello & S. Di Nuovo (Eds.). Quale scuola inclusiva in Italia. Oltre le posizioni ideologiche: risultati della ricerca. [Which inclusive school in Italy. Beyond Ideological Positions: Research Findings]. (pp. 151-179). Erickson.
Dell’Anna, S. (2021). Prefazione all’edizione italiana. [Preface to the Italian edition]. In W.W. Murawski & K.L. Scott (Eds.). Universal design for learning in pratica. Strategie efficaci per l'apprendimento inclusivo [What really works with Universal Design for Learning] (pp. 11-26). Erickson.
Domenici, G, & Biasi, V. (Eds.). (2019). Atteggiamento scientifico e formazione dei docenti. [Scientific Attitude and Teacher Training]. Franco Angeli.
Domenici, G., Lucisano, P., & Biasi, V. (2017). La ricerca empirica in educazione. [Empirical research in education]. Armando.
Dovigo, F. (2019). I bisogni educativi speciali: Un percorso verso l’inclusione?. [Special Educational Needs: A Path to Inclusion?]. In F. Dovigo & F. Pedone (Eds.), I bisogni educativi speciali. Una guida critica per insegnanti [Special Educational Needs. A Critical Guide for Teachers] (pp. 15-38). Carocci.
Dyson, M. (2010). What Might a Person-centred Model of Teacher Education Look Like in the 21st Century? The Transformism Model of Teacher Education. Journal of Transformative Education, 8(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344611406949
Falcinelli, F. (2010). La formazione dei docenti per la scuola di qualità. [Teacher training for quality schools]. In P. Crispiani (Ed.), Il Management nella scuola di qualità. [Management in Quality Schools]. (pp. 229-250). Armando.
Fiorin, I. (2017). La sfida dell’insegnamento. Fondamenti di Didattica Generale. [The challenge of teaching. Fundamentals of General Didactics]. Mondadori.
Florian L. (2019). On the Necessary Co-Existence of Special and Inclusive Education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7–8), 691–704.
Florian, L., & Linklater, H. (2010). Preparing teachers for inclusive edu- cation: using inclusive pedagogy to enhance teaching and learning for all. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4), 369-386.
Florian, L., & Beaton, M. (2018). Inclusive pedagogy in action. Getting it right for every child. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(8), 870-884. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1412513
Ghedin, E., & Mazzocut, S. (2017). Universal Design for Learning per una valorizzazione delle differenze. Un’indagine esplorativa sulle percezioni degli insegnanti. [Universal Design for Learning for an Enhancement of Differences. An Exploratory Survey of Teachers' Perceptions]. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 18, 145-162.
González-Gil, F., Martín-Pastor, E., Flores, N., Jenaro, C., Poy, R., & Gomez-vela, M. (2013). Teaching, Learning and inclusive education. The challenge of teachers’ training for inclusion. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 783-788.
Guerra, G. (2018). Per un approccio problematico al tema dell’agency nello sviluppo professionale dei docenti. [For a problematic approach to the issue of agency in the professional development of teachers]. In M. Sibilio & P. Aiello (Eds.), Lo sviluppo Professionale dei docenti. Ragionare di agentività per una scuola inclusiva. [Professional development of teachers. Reasoning about agency for an inclusive school]. (pp. 159-166). Edises.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Katz, J. (2012). Teaching to Diversity: The Three-Block Model of Universal Design for Learning. Portage & Main Press.
Katz, J., & Sokal, L. (2016). Universal Design for Learning as a Bridge to Inclusion. A Qualitative Report of Student Voices. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 12(2), 36-63.
Katz, J., Sokal, L., & Wu, A. (2019). Academic achievement of diverse K-12 learners in Three-Block Model Classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(1), 1-20.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
Liasidou, A. (2012). Inclusive Education, Politics and Policymaking. Contemporary Issues in Education Studies. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Losito, B., & Pozzo, G. (1997). The Double Track. The Dicotomy of Roles in Action research. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), International Action Research. A casebook for Educational Reform (pp. 288-299). Falmer Press.
MacArthur, S., & Rutherford, G. (2016). Success for all? Re-envisioning New Zealand school and classrooms as place where “Rights” replace “Special”. New Zealand Association for Research in Education, 51, 157-174.
Magnoler, P. (2011). Tracce di habitus?. [Traces of habitus?]. Education Sciences & Society, 2(1), 67-82.
Mangiatordi, A., & Serenelli, F. (2013). Universal design for learning: A meta-analytic review of 80 abstracts from peer reviewed journals. Research on Education and Media, 5(1), 109–118.
Manyukhina, Y., & Wyse, D. (2019). Learner agency and the curriculum: a critical realist perspective. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1599973
Mayer, A., Rose, D.H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice. CAST Professional.
McGarr, O., & McCormack, O. (2016) Counterfactual mutation of critical classroom incidents: implications for reflective practice in initial teacher education, European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2015.1066329
Melhem, T., & Al-Rashid, W. (2023). Teachers’ perception towards implementation of principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in teaching students with learning difficulties. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 29(4), 20-34. 10.52152/kuey.v29i4.772
Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the Dialogic Process of Teaching and Learning. The Value and Potential of Sociocultural Theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Jaldana J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. Sage.
Mitchell, D. (2011). What really works in special and inclusive education. Using evidence-based teaching strategies. Routledge.
Murawski, W.W., & Scott, K.L. (Eds.). (2019). What really works with Universal Design for Learning. Erickson.
Nigris E., Cardarello R., Losito B., & Vannini I. (2020). Ricerca-Formazione e miglioramento della scuola. Il punto di vista del CRESPI. [Teacher Professional Development Research and school improvement. CREPI's point of view]. RicercAzione, 12(2), 225-237. https://dx.doi.org/10.32076/RA12210
Novak, K. (2016). UDL now! A teacher’s guide to applying Universal Design for Learning in today’s classrooms. CAST Professional.
Pastori, G. (2017). In ricerca. Prospettive e strumenti di ricerca per educatori e insegnanti. [Searching. Perspectives and Research Tools for Educators and Teachers]. Spaggiari-Junior.
Pedone, F. (2019). La formazione degli insegnanti in prospettiva inclusiva. Tra sfide ed opportunità. [Teacher training in an inclusive perspective. Between challenges and opportunities]. In F. Dovigo & F. Pedone (Eds.), I bisogni educativi speciali. Una guida critica per insegnanti. [Special Educational Needs. A Critical Guide for Teachers]. (pp. 39-66). Carocci.
Pedone, F. (2021). Includere per apprendere, apprendere per includere. Formazione e sviluppo professionale inclusivo degli insegnanti. [Include to learn, learn to include. Inclusive teacher training and professional development]. Pensa Multimedia.
Pedone, F., & Moscato, M. (2023). Verso una didattica dell’inclusione e per l’inclusione. [Towards a didactics of inclusion and for inclusion]. In G. Lavanco & F. Pedone (Eds.) Oltre le colonne di Eracle. Orientamenti interdisciplinari per l’inclusione. [Beyond the Pillars of Heracles. Interdisciplinary Guidelines for Inclusion]. (pp. 119-140). Palermo: Palermo University Press.
Portelance, L., Martineau, S. & Mukamurera, J. (2014). Développement et persévérance professionnels dans l’enseignement. [Professional development and perseverance in teaching]. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Roberts, K.D., Park, H.J., Brown, S., & Cook, B. (2011). Universal Design for Instruction in Postsecondary Education. A Systematic Review of Empirically Based Articles. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 5-15.
Salvadori, I. (2019). Verso il profilo professionale dell’insegnante “esperto”. Modelli teorici e proposte metodologiche per un’epistemologia della professionalità docente nel contesto scolastico italiano. [Towards the professional profile of the "expert" teacher. Theoretical models and methodological proposals for an epistemology of teaching professionalism in the Italian school context]. FORMAZIONE & INSEGNAMENTO. 17(1), 177-186.
Savia, G. (Ed.). (2016). Universal Design for Learning. Progettazione universale per l’apprendimento e didattica inclusiva. [Universal design for learning and inclusive teaching]. Erickson.
Savia, G. (2018). Universal Design for Learning nel contesto italiano. Esiti di una ricerca sul territorio. [Universal Design for Learning in the Italian context. Results of a research on the territory]. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 6(1), 101-118.
Sgambelluri, R. (2020). Universal Design for Learning for a tailored didactics of the student. Education Sciences & Society, 11(1), 241-254.
Sibilio, M., & Aiello, P. (Eds.) 2018. Lo sviluppo Professionale dei docenti. Ragionare di agentività per una scuola inclusiva. [Professional development of teachers. Reasoning about agency for an inclusive school]. Edises.
Traversetti, M., Rizzo, A., & Pellegrini, M. (2022). Designing an accessible and sustainable classroom curriculum for reading-comprehension between school and university. A research project. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 10(2),91101. https://doi.org/10.7346/sipes-02-2022-08
Trinchero, R. (2015). Manuale di ricerca educativa. [Handbook of educational Research]. FrancoAngeli.
Trinchero, R., & Robasto, D. (2019). I mixed methods nella ricerca educativa. [Mixed methods in educational research]. Mondadori.
Unesco. (2016). Training tools for curriculum development: reaching out to all learners: a resource pack for supporting inclusive education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243279
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report, 2020. Inclusion and education: all means all. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718
Vanhulle, S., Dobrowolska, D., & Mosquera Roa, R. S. (2015). Mettre en texte une problématique professionnelle: de l’exercice du «genre réflexif» à l’appropriation des savoirs et du soi professionnels. [Putting a professional problem into text: from the exercise of "reflective gender" to the appropriation of professional knowledge and self]. Formation et pratiques d’enseignement en questions, 19, 115-126.
Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of Practice. A brief introduction, STEP Leadership Workshop. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/11736/A%20brief%20introduction%20to%20CoP.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Wenmoth, D. (2014). Learner agency. https://core-ed.org/en_NZ/free-resources/ten-trends/2014-ten-trends/learner-agency/
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2024 Pedagogical Perspective
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
