Ministerial touch on teachers’ professional development: A hands-on model as PLCs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.34Keywords:
Professional learning communities, Collaborative teaching, Teacher empowerment, Professional developmentAbstract
Professional learning communities (PLCs) represent a collaborative approach to professional development wherein colleagues engage in joint learning activities that align with their individual needs. Within the realm of education, PLCs encompass tailored initiatives aimed at enhancing teachers’ professional growth, with a specific emphasis on improving educational outcomes for teachers. The success of this approach hinges on the integration of theoretical knowledge and its practical application. The Ministry of National Education recognizes the significance of reevaluating this approach to facilitate the transformation of schools in Turkiye into collaborative learning communities through the implementation of PLC strategies. To realize this vision, the Ministry places great importance on establishing an enabling environment that encourages teacher interaction and offers diverse opportunities for their professional development. The data were collected using document analysis methodology, and the data consisted of encompassed topics related to in-service teacher training. According to the PLC Model, any PLC is utilized, beginning with participant teachers receiving theoretical training from academics and/or experts, followed by being informed about what practices to apply in their own classrooms according to their prior learning from the theoretical phase. Then, community teachers evaluate their own classroom practices, and eventually, they all gather to evaluate practices and conclude the PLC. Good practice examples are shared in the final evaluation in order to inspire other colleagues nationwide. It has been found that teachers are more efficient and productive when they work in collaboration, which is defined as establishing a working partnership in line with common goals and objectives.
References
Annan, J. K. (2020). Preparing globally competent teachers: A paradigm shift for teacher education in Ghana. Education Research International, pp. 1–9.
Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), p. 873.
Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., ... & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities (Vol. 637). Research report.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), pp. 27–40.
Boylan, M., Wolstenholme, C., Maxwell, B., Demack, S., Jay, T., Reaney, S., & Adams, G. (2019). Longitudinal evaluation of the mathematics teacher exchange: China-England-Final Report.
Chen, L. (2020). A historical review of professional learning communities in China (1949-2019): Some implications for collaborative teacher professional development. Asia Pacific Journal Of Education, 40(3), pp. 373–385.
Cheng, Y. C. (2005). Three waves of teacher education and development: Paradigm shift in applying ICT. ICT in Teacher Education, p. 39.
Cooper, J. D. (2004). Professional development: An effective research-based model. Professional Development, pp. 1–14.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 249–291
Çepni, S. (2010). Introduction to research and project studies. 5. Baskı. Trabzon.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council, p. 12.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), pp. 181-199.
Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teacher's professional development in the United States.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2009). Professional learning communities at work tm: Best practices for enhancing students achievement. Solution Tree Press.
Eurydice. (1995). In-service training of teachers in the European Union and the EFTA/EEA Countries, ed. Eurydice, Brussels.
Faulkner, F., Kenny, J., Campbell, C., & Crisan, C. (2019). Teacher learning and continuous professional development. inn Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” (pp. 269–308). Springer, Singapore.
Foschi, L. C. (2021). Innovative aspects and evaluation methods in a teachers’ continuous professional development training experience. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 46-64.
Gage, N. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath a “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), pp. 4–10.
Gore, J., Lloyd, A., Smith, M., Bowe, J., Ellis, H., & Lubans, D. (2017). Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of quality teaching rounds. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, pp. 99–113.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), p. 105.
Hassmén, P., Keegan, R., Piggott, D. (2016). Research paradigms, methodologies and methods. In: Rethinking Sport and Exercise Psychology Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48338-6_5
Howell, K.E. (2016). Paradigm of inquiry: Critical theory and constructivism. In: Howell, K., Sorour, M. (eds) Corporate governance in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56700-0_2
Iqbal, M., & Arif, M. I. (2011). Globalization and paradigm changes in teacher education: Revolutionizing teaching-learning process at school level in Pakistan. International Education Studies, 4(4), pp. 99-110.
İlhan-Beyaztaş, D., Kapti, S. B., & Senemoğlu, N. (2013). An analysis of elementary school curricula since the foundation of Republic of Turkey. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 46(2), pp. 319-344.
Karras, K. G., & Wolhuter, C. C. (Eds.). (2015). International handbook of teacher education: Training and re-training systems in modern world. HM Studies and Publishing.
Koutsopoulos, K. C., & Kotsanis, Y. C. (2014). School on cloud: Towards a paradigm shift. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 7(1), pp. 47–62.
Lauriala, A. (2013). Changes in research paradigms and their impact on teachers and teacher education: A Finnish case. In From teacher thinking to teachers and teaching: The evolution of a research community. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Leiber, T., Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. C. (2020). Bridging theory and practice of impact evaluation of quality management in higher education institutions: A SWOT analysis. In impact evaluation of quality management in higher education (pp. 117-132). Routledge.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press.
Lunenberg, M., Murray, J., Smith, K., & Vanderlinde, R. (2017). Collaborative teacher educator professional development in Europe: Different voices, one goal. Professional Development in Education, 43(4), 556-572.
MacPhail, A., Ulvik, M., Guberman, A., Czerniawski, G., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., & Bain, Y. (2019). The professional development of higher education-based teacher educators: needs and realities. Professional Development in Education, 45(5), 848-861.
Maor, D. (2003). The teacher's role in developing interaction and reflection in an online learning community. Educational Media International, 40(1-2), pp. 127–138.
Merriam, S. B. (2018). Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed., ed. Turan, S., Trans.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. (Original work published in 1998).
Moeini, H. (2008). Identifying needs: A missing part in teacher training programs. In Seminar, 4(1).
Minister of National Education (2022). https://www.oba.gov.tr/. Last accessed on 02.01.2024.
Nzarirwehi, J., & Atuhumuze, F. (2019). In-service teacher training and professional development of primary school teachers in Uganda. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(1), pp. 19-36.
Osuji, C. U., & Amadi, J. C. (2020). Global education marketing: Using distance learning to export knowledge implications on globalization. Journal of Education and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), pp. 14-25.
Öztürk, M. (2019). An evaluation of an ınnovative in-service teacher training model in Turkey. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), pp. 23–36.
Pasias, G., & Roussakis, Y. (2012). "Who marks the bench?" A critical review of the neoeuropean "paradigm shift" through higher education policies and discourses. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS), 10(1), pp. 127-141.
Phungphol, Y. (2005). Learner-centered teaching approach: A paradigm shift in Thai Education. ABAC Journal, 25(2).
Popova, A., Evans, D. K., & Arancibia, V. (2016). Training teachers on the job: What works and how to measure it. World Bank Policy Research working paper, (7834).
Tannehill, D., Demirhan, G., Čaplová, P., & Avsar, Z. (2021). Continuing professional development for physical education teachers in Europe. European Physical Education Review, 27(1), pp. 150-167.
Qian, Y., Hambrusch, S., Yadav, A., & Gretter, S. (2018). Who needs what: Recommendations for designing effective online professional development for computer science teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(2), pp. 164-181.
Sabbaghi & Vaidyanathan (2004). SWOT analysis and theory of constraint in information technology projects. Information Systems Education Journal, 2(23), pp. 1–19.
Saiti, A., & Saitis, C. (2006). In‐service training for teachers who work in full‐day schools. Evidence From Greece. European Journal of Teacher Education, 29(4), pp. 455-470.
Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France.
Scott, J. (1990). A matter of record. Documentary sources in social research, Cambridge: Polity.
Sherman, S. C. (2001). Responsiveness in teaching and teacher education (Order No. 3032806). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304764504).
Sünbül, A. G. A. M. (1996). Teacher quality and their roles in teaching. Educational Management: Theory & Practice, 8 (8), 597-608.
Şensin, C., & du Mérac, É. R. (2020). A Good Scare is Worth More Than Good Advice: Educational Regulations İn Italy And Turkey After COVID-19. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 6(3), 429-442.
Tonga, F. E., Eryiğit, S., Yalçın, F. A., & Erden, F. T. (2022). Professional development of teachers in PISA achiever countries: Finland, Estonia, Japan, Singapore, and China. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), pp. 88-104.
Torombe, R. (2013). Teachers' experiences in implementing inclusive education policy in Papua New Guinea: A study of two primary schools in the National Capital District (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato).
Tuncel, Z. A., & Çobanoğlu, F. (2018). In-service teacher training: Problems of the teachers as learners. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), pp. 159-174.
Tzivinikou, S. (2015). The impact of an in-service training program on the self-efficacy of special and general education teachers. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 64(1), pp. 95-107.
Ullah, T., & Jundran, S. (2014). Impact of district teacher educators' mentoring support on professional development of primary school teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), p. 112.
Ulla, M. B., & Winitkun, D. (2018). In-service teacher training program in Thailand: Teachers' beliefs, needs, and challenges. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(3), pp. 1579 – 1594.
Verger, A., Altinyelken, H. K., & Dekoning, M. (2013). Global managerial education reforms and teachers: Emerging policies, controversies and issues in developing contexts.
Vukelich, C., & Wrenn, L. C. (1999). Quality professional development: What do we think we know? Childhood Education, 75(3), pp. 153-160.
Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Professional development in the United States: Trends and challenges (Vol. 28). Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
Worku, S. (2016). Impact of curricular reforms in the vocational education of Ethiopia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pedagogical Perspective
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
