Original article | Pedagogical Perspective 2022, Vol. 1(1) 68-75
A comparison of Ankara University (TÖMER) and Turkey Maarif Foundation Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language Programs in terms of Skill Areas, Objectives, and Assessment Practices
Hasan Hüseyin Mutlu & Engi̇n Gümüş
pp. 68 - 75 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2022.448.5 | Manu. Number: MANU-2203-30-0001.R1
Published online: June 27, 2022 | Number of Views: 38 | Number of Download: 249
Abstract
|
The curriculum constitutes the backbone of a teaching process as a guide that defines and limits. It directs an education process in terms of approach, target, time, scope, stage, evaluation, and outputs. A well-structured curriculum is a must-have requirement for an educational process in which desired outcomes are targeted. In this study, the Turkish as foreign language teaching programs of the Maarif Foundation, which is claimed to be the product of a long-term study and large-scale research in 2019, and Ankara University TÖMER, which was put into effect in 2015, were compared in terms of purpose, skill, acquisition, and assessment-evaluation. The basics of qualitative research design carried out the research. The data of the research were analyzed by the document analysis method. According to the results of the research, it has been determined that there are significant differences between the two programs in terms of their purpose, objective, target audience, and scope. |
Keywords: Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language, Target, Skill, Assessment and Evaluation
| How to Cite this Article? |
|---|
|
APA 6th edition Harvard Chicago 16th edition |
| References |
|---|
|
Arı, G. (2017). Evaluation of (Secondary School) learning outcomes in reading in the Turkish curriculum. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 5(4), 685-703. DOI: 10.16916/aded.331660 Biçer, N. (2012). Turkish teaching for foreigns to nowadays since Huns. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 1(4), 107-133. DOI: 10.7884/teke.100 Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage, Washington DC. Durukan, E. (2013). Teachers’ views about acquisitions in Turkish lesson curriculum. Journal of Karadeniz Social Sciences, 5(8). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/149893 Er, O. , Biçer, N., & Bozkırlı, K. Ç. (2012). Evaluation of problems encountered in Turkish teaching for foreigners in terms of related literature. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 1(2), 51-69. DOI: 10.7884/teke.51 Erişen, Y. (1998). A review of program development models. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 13(13), 79-97. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/108239 İşcan, A. (2011). Importance of Turkish as foreign language. International Journal Of Eurasia Social Sciences, 2(4), 29-36. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/90094 Kan, M. O., Sülüşoğlu, B., & Demirel, Ö. (2013). Assessment of instructors and students’ opinions about program for teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 10(24), 29-42. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/182923 Melanlıoğlu, D. (2010). Turkish language curriculum in terms of culture transfer. Education and Science, 33(150), 64-73. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (Eighth edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing. |
.png){kind=logo}
